Sunday, November 28, 2021
Home Tucker Carlson Tonight Tucker Carlson: The Rittenhouse verdict was not affected by lying media, and...
Tucker Carlson: Lying media had no effect on Rittenhouse verdict and propaganda was defeated

Tucker Carlson: The Rittenhouse verdict was not affected by lying media, and the propaganda campaign was defeated


NEWFox News Articles can be listened to now!

The story began as we remember it. Kyle Rittenhouse, 17, was found on Kenosha’s streets with a gun because the leadership of Democrat Party had endorsed mob violence in order to achieve political ends in 2020. It was because Kamala Harir supported such rights that there were riots at Kenosha the next night. 

Rittenhouse, who was being tried for murder more than a decade later, had been convicted by the same people. They said that Rittenhouse would face even more violence if he was found not guilty. Imagine being a jury in that case. Think of the fear and pressure. Any juror would need to have tremendous moral courage to disregard the dangers and continue to follow the evidence until its conclusion. It took so much courage, that sometimes we wondered if it was possible in such a politically charged country. 

We learned this today that it’s still possible. 


Rittenhouse was acquitted by the jury of all charges. This was the obvious conclusion of Rittenhouse’s trial: He committed self-incrimination.defense. It was truly a momentous occasion. It was an affirmation of impartial justice for all who believe in it. Let’s not forget that moment. 

COURT CLERK: As to the first count of the information—Joseph Rosenbaum—we, the jury, find the defendant, Kyle H. Rittenhouse, not guilty. The second charge of the information, Richard McGinnis–we, the jury, find Kyle H. Rittenhouse the defendant. The third charge of the information, unknown male, is decided by the jury. We find Kyle H. Rittenhouse not guilty. We, the jury find Kyle H. Rittenhouse not guilty of the fourth informational count – Anthony Huber. The jury finds the defendant Kyle H. Rittenhouse not guilty on the fifth charge of information, Gaige Grosskreutz. 

Remarkable. Remarkable. Propaganda is not always successful. It was defeated today, thanks to God. 


The documentary team was present in Kenosha at the time. After being cleared, they spent days filming an episode of Tucker Carlson Originals on the case. Today was Kyle Rittenhouse’s first moment outside court.

KYLE RITTENHOUSE – It is the stuff that keeps your awake at night. You’ll find that your dreams become about the events of the night, which will make you awake in cold sweats. 

REPORTER : Have you ever had dreams of what might have happened? 

KYLE RITTENHOUSE – Every night. The dreams are so vivid and real that it is scary. They’re different from each other. These are the scenarios you have in your mind. What could have been? But I am alive. What could have been? It’s like, what if it wasn’t me? Or what if Mr. Rosenbaum stole my gun. These are the type of dreams that I have about the future. It is bad but nearly every outcome involves me being seriously hurt or killed. These are the kinds of dreams that I dream on a daily base.

REPORTER: What do you think, man? 

KYLERITTENHOUSE, The jury came up with the correct verdict. Self defense isn’t illegal. The verdict was correct, according to me. It was a great experience. We made it though it.

You’ll be reminded as you read this that Kyle Rittenhouse is the only American who hasn’t yet participated in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.  

For months, CNN, MSNBC and Kamala Harris, have been allowed to define him. It ends Monday. Kyle Rittenhouse is our guest for this long interview. It will air Monday on Tucker Carlson Tonight. We hope that you do. 

This case has been deemed over legally. Kyle Rittenhouse has been proclaimed innocent in a court of law. He’s free to resume his life. For the authoritarians among us, this is a disaster, they can’t let it go. Why? Because they understand the Rittenhouse case is a referendum on the most basic right of all, the ancient right of self-defense. If Kyle Rittenhouse can save his own life from the mob, then you can too. This drives them crazy.


So insane that the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee today, Jerry Nadler of New York, implied Kyle Rittenhouse may face federal charges. Nadler wrote, “Today’s verdict justifies federal review by the DOJ.” So will Joe Biden’s Justice Department indict Kyle Rittenhouse now that he’s been acquitted by a jury in Wisconsin, it’s hard to believe. You have to be deranged to consider that. What would be the effect on the country? 

But you never know with these people. At the very least, the case will be used to justify taking your guns away. This is what you can count on. But, if it does go to the Feds, if Kyle Rittenhouse is prosecuted by the Department of Justice, the case will be handled by Kristen ClarkE, the Black nationalist who runs the so-called Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department. The division that does not protect your civil rights, in fact, it’s trying to take it away. 

Legal analysts review Rittenhouse trial following verdict Video

Last year Kristen Clarke weighed in on the Rittenhouse case and zeroed in on Rittenhouse’s color like his race was some kind of crime. She described him as an “armed White man,” murdering innocent protesters at “point-blank range.” What does his race have to do with anything? It doesn’t have anything to do with anything, of course, but it’s been a fixation of the Democratic Party from the first moments. They’ve tried to racialized this case. 

And by the way, Kristen Clarke is far from the only member of the Democratic Party trying to do that. Just hours after the verdict, the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Sean Patrick Maloney, a congressman, released this statement: “It is disgusting and disturbing that someone was able to carry a loaded assault rifle into a protest against the unjust killing of Jacob Blake, an unarmed Black man.” Enjoy that moment. 

That’s from the head of the Democratic Party’s congressional campaign arm. Everything about it is wrong, not just a lie, but factually wrong. Jacob Blake was not killed. He was not also unarmed. He carried a knife. You know that because he said he was carrying a knife. He was trying to kidnap the child. That’s when the police showed up. When he grabbed a knife, they shot him. Again, that’s not in dispute. And he’s still alive. But it doesn’t matter. Because to these people, facts don’t matter, clearly. 


Sean Patrick Maloney has no interest in what actually happened. Kamala Harris said she was proud of Jacob Blake last year, the Democratic Party is sticking with that too. They are trying and they have been from the beginning to make this case into a racial divide, to further divide the country. Kamala Harris today said that the outcome of this case, the jury’s verdict, was proof that our judicial system is not “equitable,” whatever that means. You need to change it. The Attorney General of the state of New York said it needs to be completely torn down and rebuilt, our justice system, that we’ve had for 250 years, the best thing in our country. The idea that you are tried on the basis of the facts, not on the basis of what you look like. However, they want to make that change. 

ABC News, by the way, just reported the same thing. ABC News a “news corporation” told us that Jacob Blake was killed in Kenosha. 

ABC NEWS: Well, it’s very significant, first for the community of Kenosha, this city was traumatized by the police killing of a Black man, Jacob Blake.

The police killing of a Black man who is, in fact, still alive. So, what are they doing when they tell lies like this? Lies that you can check very easily or if you have a memory that extends into last year, you recall very well. Well, they’re inciting people, of course. They’re trying to whip people into a frenzy on the basis of claims that are totally, provably untrue. Is this what you call a frenzy! Well, consider this: This is from a senior advisor at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic campaign arm. Dyjuan Tatro was his name. He issued a rousing call for riots. “No justice, no peace,” he wrote in the wake of the verdict. Dyjuan Tatro is who? He, according to news reports, spent a decade in prison after he shot two people. Now he works for the Democratic Party, in case you’re interested in whose side they’re on. That was obvious. 

Whitlock: ‘This was a calculated strategy to disarm America’ Video

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Congresswoman Val Demings, another Democrat, offered this assessment: “The core of the far-right movement in America is they should be able to kill you if they want to.” That’s the official line of the Democratic Party tonight. Keep in mind, if you watch the trial, you know this, Kyle Rittenhouse was walking down the street when he was charged by a convicted child rapist and charged by a number of other people. He was not seeking conflict. There was never any evidence he was the aggressor in any case. He was the aggressor. 

Joe Biden also weighed in on this. He gave two versions of his views on it. First, he said we’re going to respect the jury’s verdict. Then when his advisors took over and wrote a new press statement, he told us how upset he was by the verdict. And that’s what aired on MSNBC all day.


CHUCK TODD, MSNBC: The next time there’s a protest of some sort, and it may get politicized, that gun owners, with a certain ideology may feel incentivized now, may feel even emboldened.

MSNBC GUEST: What some may take from this verdict is vigilante justice prevailed.

MSNBC GUEST: Knowing the history of vigilante justice in this country all the way back to times of enslavement, when people would be deputized to go out and track down enslaved persons who ran away, to lynching mobs, this is 2021.

MSNBC GUEST: It is to tell the current and future Kyle Rittenhouse’s of the world that they can engage in White vigilantism and be let off for it, be defended and protected for perpetuating White supremacy.

White vigilantism, White supremacy. White. White. White. White. White. That was over the media all day long, explicit racial attacks. What does that have to do with this case? And in what kind of country is that allowed when the most powerful people in the country level explicit racial attacks against one of their countrymen? Most of us didn’t grow up in a country where people talk like this. It’s very ominous they are talking like this now. Just as a reminder in case you’re tuning in for the first time in a year, everyone involved in this case is the same color. The people of the Council on American-Islamic Relations offered this take, which was very common today on the left: “It is difficult to imagine a Black or Muslim defendant engaged in the same conduct being found not guilty.” Really? You were here to witness the O.J. Simpson Trial? It’s ridiculous. MSNBC, the network banned from the courthouse for following jurors around, broadcast this from a relative of Jacob Blake.

Hannity: ‘It was a huge day for the right of self-defense’ Video

JUSTIN BLAKE: You tell us why he got a free ride. His bail money was raised by the Proud Boys, the Ku Klux Klan, the Nazis, the Skinheads. Is this the courtroom where they are? Do we know the history of this judge? I heard he’s been racist to these people in Kenosha for many years.

It’s really, really dark. The rest of us should not allow them to get away with racializing this, allowing them to get away with attacking people on the basis of their skin color. That is always wrong, we would never engage in that, never have, no one should do that. It is a divisive act. It’s immoral, flat out. But somehow to the crazy logic that governs their positions and deeds, they wind up defending child rapists and domestic abusers, elevating them to some sort of hero status. 

The former mayor of New York Bill de Blasio wrote, “Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum were victims, they should be alive today.” We might get a statue to Joseph Rosenbaum, but it will be a tiny one. 


Meanwhile, the ACLU, which you would think would be in favor of self-defense – that’s the most basic of all civil liberties – suggested crossing state lines is a crime. You should remain in your home state. The ACLU said, “Despite Kyle Rittenhouse’s conscious decision to travel across state lines and injure one person and take the lives of two people protesting the shooting of Jacob Blake by police, he was not held responsible for his actions.” 

This is insane. And by the way, the continuous references to crossing state lines are not insignificant. Legally they’re meaningless. You have a right to cross state lines if you’re an American because it’s your country. It’s legal to travel across all fifty states. So why do they bring that phrase into every analysis of this case? “Crossing state lines.” Because they want to use it to change gun laws. That’s right. Keep watching. 

Leo Terrell: I'm proud of the Rittenhouse jury Video

If you want to know what the worst people are saying, tune in to Jeb Bush’s former flak on MSNBC. Nicole Wallace told us anyone who crosses state lines is a domestic terrorist.

NICOLE WALLACE: The Kyle Rittenhouse acquittal today, not guilty on all counts did not happen in a cultural vacuum. There’s alarming context to this moment we’re considering and talking about. Just last week, the Department of Homeland Security released the latest bulletin warning Americans, again, of the ongoing threat posed by domestic violent extremists. We should also point out conservative media for many, many months have been priming its audience for this moment, framing Rittenhouse as a hero.


So why are we inflicting that on you on a day when all of us should be celebrating? We’ll tell you why. 

Because none of that made any difference to the jury. And if you’re totally absorbed in American media, you get the impression that American media are in charge of our country. And it turns out, they’re not. Most people don’t watch that crap. They don’t care what people like that say. They don’t care at all. There are a lot of rational, decent, thoughtful people on all sides of all races in this country who are still willing to think clearly about what is right, what is wrong, what is factual, what is false, what is just, and what is not. Today they succeeded. So, that’s the real lesson here. In the face of all of that propaganda, a group of jurors in Kenosha, Wisconsin, were brave enough to reach the right and obvious conclusion anyway. Amen. 

This article has been adapted to Tucker Carlson’s opening comments on the “Tucker Carlson Tonight”, November 19, 2021 issue.


Share Your Comment Below


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Andala Cafe News